...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. Measured against these standards, Art ll96 of the Texas Penal Code, in restricting legal abortions...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother." 410 US at 163. (Emphasis added.) "Even though" tne~state's interest in the post-viable unborn is compelling,...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. Measured against these standards, Art. 1196 of the Texas Penal Code, in restricting legal abortions...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go as far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother49. Post-Roe US Supreme Court decisions are likewise instructive on this point. In Mauer v. Roe...

...regulation to protect the fetus is not constitutionally required but is permitted, except where abortion is necessary to "preserve the life or health of the mother." Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113, 164 (1973). However, state laws attempting to require doctors performing abortions to try...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. Measured against these standards, Article 1196 of the Texas Penal Code, in restricting legal abortions...

...abortion can be subordinated to the state's interest in "protecting fetal life after viability . . . except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother." The federal courts have also recognized the qualified nature of the right to privacy in other cases,...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. Measured against these standards, [the Texas statute] . . . sweeps too broadly . . . [and] therefore,...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. I am making the assumption that this language in part 2 of the statute that says that any time if such...

...protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother."72 At this writing, Roe is still the law of the land, despite numerous attempts by state legislatures...